The
main objective of introducing the new contributory pension scheme in 2004 was
stated to be to arrest the financial outflow on account of the constant
increase in the pension liability of the Government. The IMF had earlier
advised the Government to do so as a measure to contain the fiscal deficit in
the Union Budget.
The employees and Officers organisations had
been consistently opposing this move and had been presenting the obvious fact
that the pension liability of the Government would not be abated by this move,
rather it would only register an increase. The 6th CPC
set up a Committee to go into the matter headed by Dr.
Gayatri. The Committee’s conclusion was akin to what the
employees organisations were all along making.
The
matter came up for the consideration of the 7th CPC again as by
that time the new scheme had been in operation for more than a
decade. The Commission received many complaints and suggestions
from the stake holders. These had been enumerated in their
report. Instead of making any recommendation, the Commission
suggested to the Government to set up a Committee to go into these complaints
and take remedial measures.
Govt.
set up such a committee under the Chairmanship of the then Secretary, Pension,
who heard the presentations made by the Service organisations and the
Pensioners Associations. One of the suggestions made before
the committee was to guarantee a minimum pension or a minimum return for the
investments being made by the employees during their service
career. It is reported that the Committee has submitted its report
to the Govt. But the same has not come to the public domain so far.
The Pensioners are, rightly so, apprehensive
of the continuation of the present defined benefit pension system, they
enjoy. The employees, who are recruited after 01.01.2004 are highly
agitated as the new scheme guarantees no mimum annuity nor does the projection
made by the PFRDA gives them any hope for a decent return for the contribution
they make every month which is presently 10% of their Pay + DA.
The facts
now available with the Government over the financial outflow from the exchequer
both in respect of the Pension liability of the employees who were recruited
prior to 01.01.2004 and the contribution the Government is to make under the
new contributory scheme must convince that the decision taken to introduce the
new scheme in replacement of the erstwhile defined benefit scheme had been
flawed.
If
that be so, the scheme requires to be scrapped lock stock and barrel as it has
not benefitted the Govt, nor the subscribers, i.e. the employees.
The discontent over this ill advised decision is growing day by day and the
younger generation of workers and officers have become highly
critical. We, therefore, request you to kindly cause a revisit with
a view to bring back the defined benefit pension scheme for all Central
Government employees and Officers.
No comments:
Post a Comment