The 7th CPC submitted its report in
November 2015. The Empowered Committee of Secretaries blocked it for 7 long
months. Finally the cabinet approved the report without any modification, The
Gazette Notification on the pay and allowances of employees was issued on
25-07-2016. The same minimum pay of Rs.18000/-. The same multiplication factor
of 2.57. Absolutely no change.
Let us now analyse what would have been the
case, had 50% of Dearness Allowance / Dearness Relief been merged with pay /
pension with effect from 01-11-2011. DA merger had taken place before
implementation of 5th and 6th CPC Recommendations. Though we had demanded it
this time also, it was not agreed to. Whether enough organizational pressure
was there to get the demand accepted is now an academic issue for discussion
only.
The DA / DR was 51% in January 2011. The
percentage rates of DA/DR were 58, 65, 72, 80, 90, 100 107, 113, 119 and 125
during subsequent six monthly periods up to January 2016. Now we shall workout
the financial implication of the 50% DA/DR merger notionally.
A person with a
basic pay / pension of Rs. 10,000/- would have got Rs. 1,06,500/- as difference
in DA/DR for the period 01-01-2011 to 31-12-2015. That is the notional loss. It
is easy to workout.
For every 1,000
rupee as pay / pension, the benefit would have been Rs. 10650/- We cannot even
dream of such an amount as pay revision “bonanza”. The pay + DA of the lowest
paid employee who was drawing Rs. 7,000/- (5,200 +1,800). On 01-01-2016 would
have been Rs. 18375/- In that case, no Pay Commission would have dared to
recommend Rs. 18000/- as minimum pay as it would have been less than the actual
pay + DA drawn by the employee.
Even if we accept the 14.29% increase
recommended by the 7th CPC, the minimum pay would have been Rs. 21,000/- and so
the multiplication factor would have increased to 3 instead of 2.57. Employees
and pensioners would have been benefited significantly. We were after the euphoria
of a Pay Commission. We thought the CPC and the Government will deliver us
good. It was a folly on our part in not clinching the demand of merger of 50%
DA with effect from 01-01-2011.
No comments:
Post a Comment